(Source: marxisforbros)
dial A for ALBB.
“ If you’re entitled to hold an opinion, then we are thereby entitled to have an opinion about your opinion. It’s the same entitlement. If it’s universal then it can work against you. ”
-
moncler----outlet liked this
-
lynleyclare liked this
-
sheenalopez liked this
-
thefurtheradventuresofbarmcake liked this
-
dazaibrosamu liked this
-
goingtothecasino liked this
-
colamonstrosity liked this
-
molokomoloko liked this
-
-spittingvenom liked this
-
obfuscationgeek liked this
-
smileynamedbyhim liked this
-
keely- liked this
-
ricktimus liked this
-
vonnegutandcathair liked this
-
tweakyou liked this
-
disorientedmentally liked this
-
internetpredator liked this
-
kajikitsune liked this
-
sollapalooza liked this
-
albb liked this
-
snailtale liked this
-
i-ngra-leat liked this
-
illtakethechances liked this
-
mattgorman said:
Reductio ad absurdum is kind of a fallacy and you’re really not supposed to use it, but in this case it was probably justified given the monumental stupidity of the opposing side’s statement.
-
mattgorman liked this
-
theslappee liked this
-
leonrw liked this
-
six-klicks-east liked this
-
veronica-vaughn said:
oh my god this is great i can’t believe i read everything
-
twistedhypocrisy liked this
-
popinfresh73 liked this
-
midsummeradieu liked this
-
kodyxvx liked this
-
mieshe liked this
-
obi-wankenblowme liked this
